Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 08:41:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGN7qDDDbOotr-cGmDzY_wjgKegR+SpPz7ecWRp74MVJugpnKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Calculemus <calculemus1988@gmail.com>
Cc: steve@fenestra.com, www-svg@w3.org
Sorry, I said it backwards: the *less* opacity the more it goes to white [?] On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Calculemus <calculemus1988@gmail.com>wrote: > But in your example, more opacity actually means we go away from white: > > > (.5, 0, 0) + (1-.5)*(1,1,1) = (1, .5, .5) > > Higher opacity will make this multiplier smaller, (1-0.5) in this case. > For example for low opacity 0.1, we will have: > > (.5, 0, 0) + (1-.1)*(1,1,1) = (1, .9, .9) and that is pretty close to > white. >
(image/gif attachment: 338.gif)