W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > July 2012

Re: [css3-images] Image Fragments and SVG URIs

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:59:52 -0700
Message-ID: <4FF5B9F8.3040400@inkedblade.net>
To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
CC: www-style@w3.org, www-svg@w3.org
On 07/05/2012 04:07 AM, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote:
> Tab Atkins Jr.:
>> Media Fragments were designed for arbitrary media. It wouldn't make
>> much sense to use something named "svgView()" on a PNG, after all.
>> ^_^  Even if it duplicates existing specced functionality in SVG, it
>> would be nice if MF syntax worked on SVG as well as raster images.
> I did no test here, if we assume, that available viewers indicate problems
> with fragment identifiers like id="xywh=" or id="t=..." anyway,
> no author will have used such structures, allowed or not.
> And even if some viewers might accept 'wrong' values for id (I think, some
> do), the probability that someone used such values will be low, is my
> guess. Therefore indeed, it might not cause any/relevant backwards
> incompatibility problems, if such an addition to indicate another view
> of the document in SVG2 is defined respectively referenced.
> Obviously for SVG 1.0, 1.1 and tiny 1.2 this is still wrong and
> authors nevertheless have to use for example
> sprites.svg#svgView(viewBox(40,0,20,20))
> to get the intended effect.

This is a spec for implementers, not a tutorial for authors.
The examples show what is intended to work if the spec were implemented,
which is not necessarily what is implemented and ready for production use.

Received on Thursday, 5 July 2012 16:00:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:29:51 UTC