W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: SVG 2 FPWD published

From: Jeremie Patonnier <jeremie.patonnier@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:11:12 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEi838kroNR1dLhFWwgEYJtNU_V-_T66q4iVLngA7HqE4ZqKwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Cc: SVG public list <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi SVG WG :)

2012/8/29 Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>

> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-**SVG2-20120828/<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-SVG2-20120828/>
>

Nice to see SVG 2 FPWD out :)

I know it's a very early WD but here are some small quick thought about it:

   - Section 1.6
   I'm looking forward for the definition of "lacuna value" but I'm not
   sure it is quite différente than "default value" which seams a bit more
   easier to understand.
   - Section 2.3
   It is stated that SVG can be embedded in an HTML page using the img
   element or throught CSS. Is their a normative reference somewhere that
   define the limit of SVG embedded that way? For exemple, Firefox does not
   allow scripts or external ressources in such cases. If this normative
   reference exist it would be nice to have a link to it. If it does not
   exist, it worth considering writing it in order to help implementor
   to define common behaviors.
   - Section 4.4
   Maybe it would be worth considering to reference css3-color instead of
   having the list of color keywords.
   Maybe this should be part of chapter 12.
   - Section 5.7
   Maybe it miss an annotation about
   http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Requirements_Input#.3Cuse.3E_cleanup?
   - Section 23
   Maybe it miss an annotation about
   http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Requirements_Input#Extensibility?

I hope this will help

Best regards
-- 
Jeremie
.............................
Web : http://jeremie.patonnier.net
Twitter : @JeremiePat <http://twitter.com/JeremiePat>
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 13:12:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:52 GMT