W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: SVG <length> to <length> | <percentage>

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:18:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCrucf-HysrVt7TmrXLb3MF0eiZx=G_YyZtzxcNsVNVuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, "www-svg@w3.org list" <www-svg@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:
> On Monday, August 20, 2012, 4:37:52 PM, Tab wrote:
> TAJ> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
>>> On Aug 19, 2012, at 4:43 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:
>>>> What about units for <angle>?
>>> CSS supports all of SVG and more. The default is 'deg' for us in SVG.
>
> TAJ> Oh man, are there unitless numbers that are meant to be <angle>s in
> TAJ> SVG?  Please tell me they haven't infected the properties, but are
> TAJ> instead limited just to attributes that take *only* that single value.
>
> Please tell me that SVG doesn't need to pretend to use grads and suchlike wierd angle units.

You don't have to "pretend".  You can support them or not.  If you
already do, because it's part of your larger CSS support, great.  If
not, whatever.

~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2012 18:19:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:52 GMT