W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: SVG Compositing

From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 16:07:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGN7qDCTmc+Eodqtkn2uC2saMyRi-5w=w+N_sLkmMVaFXRm=1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Bob Holmes <rangsynth@gmail.com>, www-svg@w3.org
Yes, please let us know if you find something in the latest spec confusing
or if you find a bug.
Also, if you spot differences (apart from combining blending and
compositing) let us know as well.

Rik

On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Bob Holmes <rangsynth@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There is an SVG document called "Compositing and Blending 1.0" dated
> > "25 July 2012" somewhere around and it splits the compositing and the
> > blending into two steps. That made for sense to me but now in the
> > other SVG spec with the "comp op" properties it puts the blenders and
> > the compositors into the single property, so therefore the result of a
> > multplication or overlay is not then subject to any further
> > compositing operator.
>
> The "Compositing and Blending" spec you mention
> <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/raw-file/tip/compositing/index.html> is
> the one you should be paying attention to.  Anything else is an old
> draft that has been superceded by the new one I just linked to.
>
> If there's anything confusing in the C&B draft, let us know, but you
> can safely ignore any confusion stemming from the old drafts.  ^_^
>
> ~TJ
>
>
Received on Sunday, 5 August 2012 23:07:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:51 GMT