- From: Peter Junge <peter.junge@gmx.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 10:08:55 +0800
- To: SVG List <www-svg@w3.org>
Am 05.05.2011 15:22, schrieb David Woolley: > Peter Junge wrote: > >> 2) The second alternative would mean going one step further by also >> defining an internal SVG compatible namespace for UOML. OpenDocument >> Format e.g. is also using a subset of SVG by defining it's own svg >> namespace > > I would have thought that the way that would best match the original XML > concept would be to define a profile of SVG, then use the actual SVG > namespace. Thanks David, this seems to be the solution I'm looking for. Best regards, Peter
Received on Monday, 9 May 2011 02:09:34 UTC