W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Reusing a subset of SVG in another standard

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 08:22:59 +0100
Message-ID: <4DC25053.2080205@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: Peter Junge <peter.junge@gmx.org>, SVG List <www-svg@w3.org>
Peter Junge wrote:

> 2) The second alternative would mean going one step further by also 
> defining an internal SVG compatible namespace for UOML. OpenDocument 
> Format e.g. is also using a subset of SVG by defining it's own svg 
> namespace 

I would have thought that the way that would best match the original XML 
concept would be to define a profile of SVG, then use the actual SVG 

That allows an SVG aware tool to extract and render it without having to 
know anything about UOML.

David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2011 07:23:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:29:47 UTC