W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Reusing a subset of SVG in another standard

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 08:22:59 +0100
Message-ID: <4DC25053.2080205@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: Peter Junge <peter.junge@gmx.org>, SVG List <www-svg@w3.org>
Peter Junge wrote:

> 2) The second alternative would mean going one step further by also 
> defining an internal SVG compatible namespace for UOML. OpenDocument 
> Format e.g. is also using a subset of SVG by defining it's own svg 
> namespace 

I would have thought that the way that would best match the original XML 
concept would be to define a profile of SVG, then use the actual SVG 
namespace.

That allows an SVG aware tool to extract and render it without having to 
know anything about UOML.
> 


-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2011 07:23:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:48 GMT