W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: [OpenType] SVG Fonts inside of OpenType fonts? [Cross-post from www-font@w3.org]

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:58:52 +1200
Message-ID: <BANLkTinG1bXz3mMXWG1U_GtKJGggGRh_LA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotypeimaging.com>
Cc: "opentype-migration-list@indx.co.uk" <opentype-migration-list@indx.co.uk>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Levantovsky, Vladimir <
Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotypeimaging.com> wrote:

> I had a similar question - why would this distinction should be introduced
> at the potential expense of duplicating all glyph data? One possible way to
> address it is to consider the initial state (frame 1) of animated glyph
> description as its static representation if animation is not supported.
>

That is basically what we do for SVG images. I think we should carry on
doing that for fonts.

Rob
-- 
"If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in
us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our
sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned,
we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us." [1 John 1:8-10]
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 21:59:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:48 GMT