W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > July 2011

RE: Typo on SVG11

From: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:18:33 -0400
To: "'Cameron McCormack'" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "'Jeremie Patonnier'" <jeremie.patonnier@gmail.com>
Cc: "'www-svg'" <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000c01cc4869$79b2d1f0$6d1875d0$@net>
Hey Cameron!

While you're at it, here's another:

A part of [1] reads:

When the text content of a graphic (e.g., in a
<http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/text.html#TextElement> 'text' element) explains
its function, no text equivalent is required. Use the
<http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/struct.html#TitleElement> 'title' child element to
explain the function <http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/text.html#TextElement>
'text' elements whose meaning is not clear from their text content.

Perhaps the word "of" between "function" and "text" might help.



[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/access.html 

-----Original Message-----
From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Cameron McCormack
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 12:42 AM
To: Jeremie Patonnier
Cc: www-svg
Subject: Re: Typo on SVG11

Hi Jeremie,

Jeremie Patonnier:
> There is a little typo mistake on section 17.4.2 of the SVG 11 spec. This
> section is about SVGViewElement DOM interface but it mention a link to the
> SVGAElement DOM interface.

Thanks!  I’ve fixed this in the CVS copy, now.


Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Friday, 22 July 2011 12:19:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:25 UTC