W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > August 2011

Re: enable-background and filters

From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:33:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGN7qDD-A-mLY4xopUZZ9CptwBY5KMPG_jdAd3ZSR5Lf0rByJg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jasper van de Gronde <th.v.d.gronde@hccnet.nl>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
If you want a complete and mathematically correct description, check out the
chapter on Transparency in the PDF reference manual.
enable-background: new/accumulate corresponds with isolate: true/false.

Rik Cabanier
Adobe Systems, Inc

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Jasper van de Gronde <
th.v.d.gronde@hccnet.nl> wrote:

> On 01-08-11 06:08, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> > ...
> >> Render all children of Ai up to but*not including Ai-1* into BUFi. The
> >> children are painted, then filtered, clipped, masked and composited
> >> using the various painting, filtering, clipping, masking and object
> >> opacity settings on the given child.
> >
> >>From my example:
> > Buf3 will contain the content of A3 up to A2.
> > If <rect x="25".../> had been a group with blending and filtering, it
> > would be "painted, then filtered, clipped, masked and composited using
> > the various painting, filtering, clipping, masking and object opacity
> > settings on the given child."
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
>
> Sounds sensible, I think it was the "up to but not including" that threw
> me off. I think it makes sense now, if we run into additional problems
> I'll let you know. Who knows, with a bit of luck we'll finally have a
> conforming implementation of enable-background in Inkscape when the next
> release comes out :)
>
>
Received on Monday, 1 August 2011 16:33:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:49 GMT