- From: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>
- Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 12:18:32 +1000
- To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Boris wrote: --Original Message--: ><snip/> > >> Current code most likely looks for an existing >> child text node and tries to replace the referenced string. It should >> of course see the missing child node and add a new one to host the 'eggs'. > >Um, no. Not at all. I'd _really_ like to know what part of DOM3 Core >led you to think the above so it can be rewritten.... Sorry I didn't read the original test case properly to see what Boris pointed out. Apologies for the confusion, and the note about 'firstChild' being null explains everything. Alex
Received on Sunday, 3 October 2010 02:19:42 UTC