Boris wrote: --Original Message--: ><snip/> > >> Current code most likely looks for an existing >> child text node and tries to replace the referenced string. It should >> of course see the missing child node and add a new one to host the 'eggs'. > >Um, no. Not at all. I'd _really_ like to know what part of DOM3 Core >led you to think the above so it can be rewritten.... Sorry I didn't read the original test case properly to see what Boris pointed out. Apologies for the confusion, and the note about 'firstChild' being null explains everything. AlexReceived on Sunday, 3 October 2010 02:19:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:46 GMT