W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2010

[Bug 10968] SVGRGB values need hash

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:25:59 +0000
To: www-svg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PGbqR-0002wn-QG@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10968

Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|HTML5                       |RelaxNG Schema
            Version|HEAD                        |SVG 1.1 Full
         AssignedTo|mike@w3.org                 |schepers@w3.org
            Product|Validator                   |SVG
   Target Milestone|---                         |Feature Request
          QAContact|www-validator-cvs@w3.org    |www-svg@w3.org

--- Comment #4 from Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> 2010-11-11 18:25:59 UTC ---
the SVG 1.1 RelaxNG grammar currently used by validator.nu and thus by the W3C
HTML validation backend was essentially taken straight from
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/rng/svg-paint-attrib.rng

That grammar defines the datatype for the "fill" attribute simply as "string".

So validator.nu does not real checking on the value of that attribute at all.

If there is a deficiency here, it is in the upstream schema. if the upstream
schema is revised to do stricter constraint checking on that attribute, i will
be happy to port the changes to valdiator.nu

meanwhile, I'm changing the product on this bug to "SVG"

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 18:26:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:46 GMT