W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Additions to SVG 1.1 2nd Edition Conformance Tests

From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:10:12 +0100
To: "Patrick Dengler" <patd@microsoft.com>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u9pqu4k3geuyw5@localhost>
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:17:31 +0100, Patrick Dengler <patd@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> Hello SVG Working Group!
> As I mentioned several weeks ago, we have has just submitted 31  
> additional cases to the 1.1F2 test suite which are ready for review.

Thanks!

A few comments:
* For consistency with the rest of the testsuite it'd be nice if the tests
were changed to use green (#0f0 / "lime") instead of black for indicating
pass conditions
* The tests that look like they're empty when they pass should be remade
such that something green is visible when passed
* If it doesn't affect the purpose of the test, moving shapes to be
centered in the frame would be good
* Many of these tests are so simple that they should be joined into a
single test IMHO.
* The test templates' text should not be commented out

> We’ve attempted to follow the design, intent and flow of the existing  
> tests and to help round out conformance. The file names are listed below.
...
> struct-svg-01-f.svg

That test is in conflict with

     http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/svgdom-over-01-f.svg

and with SVG1.1F2

     http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/svgdom.html#SVGDOMOverview

I think it'd be better to extend svgdom-over-01-f.svg with the cases for
valueAsString too, should be straightforward to add that.

Cheers
/Erik

-- 
Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2010 13:04:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:44 GMT