Re: Is implied lineto after moveto ambiguous?

On Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 7:18:52 PM, Rick wrote:

R> It would seem to me that a relative move should imply a relative
R> lineto and an absolute move would imply an absolute lineto.

That seems reasonable, yes.

R> Further to this, if a path starts with a relative move, it is seen as
R> an absolute move, since there is nothing for it to be relative to, but
R> it could/should be used to imply a relative lineto.

R> I haven't tested browsers, I would be willing to expend the effort if
R> any interest is shown.

Interest++



-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Technical Director, Interaction Domain
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG