W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > October 2009

Re: Renaming 'filter' member of CSSStyleDeclaration

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:20:06 +0200
To: robert@ocallahan.org
Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u11f3sje64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:57:41 +0200, Robert O'Callahan  
<robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> Personally I'm wavering ... I think perhaps given that we already have to
> have black magic in JS engines to support undetectability for  
> document.all,
> maybe we should just reuse it here for the sake of consistency of the
> property name.

 From a recent thread on public-script-coord/public-html it seems that  
Bredan Eich and others from TC39 think this is something we should  
absolutely avoid. I'd personally much prefer it if all attributes that  
were supported are listed on the object as well. Seems better for authors.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 19 October 2009 08:20:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:43 GMT