W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > October 2009

Re: Renaming 'filter' member of CSSStyleDeclaration

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:29:33 +0200
To: robert@ocallahan.org, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u10lzjte64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook.local>
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:17:44 +0200, Robert O'Callahan  
<robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> They've worked around it by making 'filter' undetectable with magic JS  
> hacks similar to what multiple browsers do with "document.all". But a  
> much simpler solution is to name the CSSStyleDeclaration member instead,  
> say 'svgFilter'.
> How do people feel about that? I'm not sure if any spec needs to be  
> changed since apparently the names of the CSSStyleDeclaration SVG  
> members aren't
> actually in any spec...

cssFilter would be better for consistency with cssFloat, I think; also  
since properties are not restricted to particular languages.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 18 October 2009 21:30:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:43 GMT