Re: Changing attributeType="CSS"

On 31/10/2009, at 11:22 PM, Jonathan Watt wrote:

>> And looking in the current CSS transition draft indeed the opposite  
>> is true,
>> there are only a few properties indicated to be animatable,
>
> I only looked in CSS animations for restrictions and saw none - I  
> erroneously
> assumed that the same was true of transitions. Anyway, my point is  
> that I don't
> see any need to restrict what SMIL can animate relative to *either*  
> of these CSS
> proposals.

I recently updated the CSS transitions specification to simply refer  
to SVG for the list of animatable properties. It was never the  
intention to produce a restricted set.

Dean