W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Input on the agenda

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:57:27 +0100
To: "Jeff Schiller" <codedread@gmail.com>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.urcl91rk64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:51:14 +0100, Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>  
wrote:
> I'm sorry that I'm not familiar enough with how self-closing elements
> are treated in HTMLish syntax.  Can someone please tell me how the
> current SVG-in-HTML algorithm would treat the following SVG code
> fragments?

If enclosed in <svg> they'd work fine. Self-closing syntax is supported  
within <svg> and <math> subtrees.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 12:58:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:41 GMT