W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2009

Re: SVG Revision of HTML5 Proposal (ACTION-117) (was: Input on the agenda)

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:26:01 +0000 (UTC)
To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Cc: public-html@w3.org, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0903240225060.25058@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Doug Schepers wrote:
> > 
> >     What would be particularly helpful is replies to the topics discussed
> >     by these e-mails:
> > 
> >        http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Mar/0230.html
> >        http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Mar/0231.html
> > 
> >     It is not clear to me whether the SVGWG agrees with the reasoning I put
> >     forward on these issues or whether I am wrong; in the latter case, it
> >     would be helpful if my errors could be pointed out.
> 
> With regards to the outstanding issues, we've put what we consider to be 
> reasonable language in our revision of the sections in question.

The questions weren't really with regard to what the wording should be, so 
much as what the reasoning behind the requests were. It is this 
information that would be most useful, IMHO.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2009 02:26:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:41 GMT