Re: View Source

Philip TAYLOR wrote:

> 
> No, I am certainly opposed : when I say "view source", that
> is exactly what I mean; if there were an option "view
> DOM serialisation", I could envisage uses for it, but
> the two are as different as chalk and cheese.

Whilst I think there is a need for both modes, there is a long historic 
precedent for view source not showing the true source, e.g. Netscape 
showed the output from load time document.write's, not the original source.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.