W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2009

Re: View Source

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:13:28 +0000
Message-ID: <49C0AD28.8010804@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: www-svg@w3.org
CC: public-html@w3.org
Philip TAYLOR wrote:

> 
> No, I am certainly opposed : when I say "view source", that
> is exactly what I mean; if there were an option "view
> DOM serialisation", I could envisage uses for it, but
> the two are as different as chalk and cheese.

Whilst I think there is a need for both modes, there is a long historic 
precedent for view source not showing the true source, e.g. Netscape 
showed the output from load time document.write's, not the original source.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 08:14:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:41 GMT