W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2009

Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:55:18 +0000
Message-ID: <49BB8D16.20800@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
CC: public-html@w3.org
Henri Sivonen wrote:

> 
> When users want to browse to the same pages on their phones that they 
> browse to on their desktops, the value of mobile profiles is defeated.

I suspect the mobile phone operators are more interested in SVG as a 
vehicle for premium content; they probably don't like the idea that 
users might find equivalent content for free on the more general web.

The market may push them to providing more general browsers, but that 
will be as full browsers, not as extensions to mobile SVG.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 14 March 2009 10:56:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:41 GMT