Alex Russell wrote: > > On Jan 26, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > >> >> Alex Russell wrote: >>> Can this be represented in a :not() clause somehow? Foisting more >>> work onto script is the wrong answer. >> >> No. > > How about "not yet"? I think the more correct answer is "not in this version". / JonasReceived on Monday, 26 January 2009 23:29:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 26 January 2009 23:29:57 GMT