- From: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:30:05 +0100
- To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, www-svg@w3.org, birtles@gmail.com
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:57:26 +0100, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de> wrote: > > I noted already several times, that this test contains several errors > and a lot of description and behaviour, not fitting together. > > Not only the scale animation is problematic, the rotate with > changed rotate center is wrong too, and the test for translation > is almost insensitive to the implemented distance function, > therefore almost useless. > > A long time ago I provided an improved version for this. Just for reference, I think that's here[4] (apologies for the w3c-member-only link). > Unfortunately this was not updated yet (the formula for > scaling and rotation for paced was fixed in later drafts > of SVGT 1.2 too, compared to earlier drafts). > Maybe it is an even better idea to split up this test in two > documents, one for linear and one for paced and added > samples for skewing too. > > There is still a lot to do to fix this and some other tests > in the test suite ... I have ACTION-2411 [1] to review the test against the 1.2T REC, and in the mean time I've marked the test as being an unapproved draft[2][3]. Cheers /Erik [1] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2411 [2] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-82-t.svg [3] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/animate-elem-82-t.svg [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2007AprJun/0001.html -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 13:30:32 UTC