Re: Setting animVal.value?

Hi Cameron,

Thanks Cameron for your very prompt and helpful reply.

2009/8/7 Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>

> > If not, can I suggest it would be better to simply make the contents
> > of animVal always readonly. This would have the advantage of being
> > more predictable for script (as well as being easier to implement).
>
> Yes I think that would be better.  I think animVal should always be a
> distinct object from baseVal, but whose contents will happen to be the
> same as the baseVal contents when the attribute is not animated.


Assuming that others agree, is there any chance something like this could
find its way into SVG 1.1SE? Or is it too late for that?

Best regards,

Brian