W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: [1.2T-LC] inverse and constrained transformations

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:00:29 +0100
Message-ID: <48DE74BD.9050407@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: www-svg@w3.org

Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote:

> that the effect is gained with other methods (what should be 
> always possible even without using the not always existing 
> inverse matrix, because the document contains much more 
> information about the transformations than only the CTM)?

Can you provide a concrete example.  I would have though that, if the 
inverse didn't exist, there will always be points that don't have a 
unique image when the transform is reversed.

David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 27 September 2008 18:01:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:15 UTC