W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > October 2008

Re: Notes on implementing non-local URI references and resource documents

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:39:58 +0200
To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>, www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.ui0n8w0664w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:05:39 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:00:29 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>  
>> wrote:
>>> What if it has fill="url(foo.svg#bar)", though?  Per SVG 1.1 that's  
>>> suddenly a non-local reference, right?  Should that fill be rendered?
>
> This is the real question.

I agree that url(foo.svg#bar) should be a same-document reference if the  
document is foo.svg and there's no base URI messing things up. I was just  
making a point about one of the implications you pointed out.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2008 13:41:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:40 GMT