W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2008

Re: RE : [1.2T LC]: accessing rules for traitAccess (ISSUE-2094 ACTION-2316)

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:08:10 -0500
Message-ID: <490E32DA.3010602@w3.org>
To: Julien Reichel <Julien.Reichel@spinetix.com>
CC: www-svg@w3.org

Hi, Julien-

Thanks again for your comment... reply inline.

Julien Reichel wrote (on 10/24/08 3:24 AM):
>  
> Thank you for your answer.  I'm not sure I understand your answer corecly:
>  
> You are saying that:
> 1) you think the restriction on the modification of the href while the
> element is in the tree is necessary and thus you will keep it ?
> This address my comment and I am satisfied with it. I believe this is an
> important restriction.
>  
> 2) You do not want to add additional restriction on the modification of
> xml:id (or id) of ellement already in the tree, because this is alleady
> implemented in most UA and in many content "in the wild", and you don't
> think this is a necessary restriction ?
> This address my comment, and altrough I still think that if no
> restriction is imposed on xml:id then this will impose the same burden
> on implementation as if the href could be modified. I'm not happy with
> the answer but I understand and I am "satified" with it.
>  
> Now, to re-send you erik's question:
> what append when the xml:id of an element targeted by an animation is
> modified ?
> - no effect the animation continue.
> - an exception is raised
> - The animation stops (or start) on the new target (and stop on teh old
> target).
>  
> If there is no restriction on the modification of the xml:id of element
> in the tree and the target of an animation, then a note should be added
> to say that the result is not specified and will be UA dependent...

We have made the change you requested:
 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/animate.html#TargetElement

Since you have already indicated your satisfaction with the rest of the
issue, we have marked you as being satisfied with our resolution of
ISSUE-2094.  If this is not the case, please let us know.

Regards-
-Doug
Received on Sunday, 2 November 2008 23:08:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:41 GMT