- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 20:48:19 +1000
- To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi Jonathan. Jonathan Chetwynd: > why so quiet? > > in html # can be used as part of a uri to point to an anchor in the > document, conforming UAs generally display the document from that point. > > it seems natural to me that for svg where # is part of use > > http://www.peepo.org.uk/icon-ark/edemocracy.svgz#braille > > might only display the single symbol #braille. > > is something similar planned fro SVG1.2? Indeed it is planned, and even specified. Have a look at http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/linking.html#SVGFragmentIdentifiers. > could this be an errata for 1.1? can't see why not as the syntax has no > current use and what else might be preferred? Actually the syntax has a slightly different (and incompatible) meaning in SVG 1.1: If the SVG fragment identifier addresses any element other than a 'view' element, then the document defined by the closest ancestor 'svg' element is displayed in the viewport using the view specification attributes on that 'svg' element. — http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/linking.html#SVGFragmentIdentifiers -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2008 10:49:10 UTC