Hi, Folks- Hallvord R. M. Steen wrote (on 3/13/08 10:08 PM): > > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:24:45 +0900, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > >> The proper fix here is IMHO to add something to the window object. So >> that you don't have to reach out into documents that are from a >> different domain. > > Agree. Would window.paramList be a good name? An object with name:value > mappings would be useful, and one could iterate over it with for..in as > usual. Agreed. I think this should be specified in the Window spec (and maybe to the HTML5 spec?). Boris Zbarsky wrote (on 3/13/08 3:11 PM): > >> It would have >> been great if HTMLObjectElement had an accessible "params" NodeList >> readonly attribute :( > > Yes, indeed. It's not too late to add that! Boris, do you mean that it's not too late to add that to Fx3? What about window.paramList? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPIReceived on Friday, 14 March 2008 03:07:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 14 March 2008 03:07:58 GMT