W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Filter Meeting

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:56:49 -0500
Message-ID: <4797C631.5070802@w3.org>
To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>

Hi, Folks-

It just occurred to me that I didn't articulate why I chose the people I 
did for this invitation.

Can any of you see a pattern?  Yes, that's right, all of the people 
listed are implementors who've chimed in on this topic.

Firefox/Mozilla: Tor, Roc
Safari/Webkit: Oliver
Opera: Erik, editor of new Filters spec
Inkscape: Mental

Ken Stacey and Jeff Schiller have also contributed significantly to the 
discussion, so if either of you are available, it would be interesting 
to have you join in as well.  Let me know.


p.s. I'm excited to see that filters are being implemented so widely. Yay!


Thanks-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI


Doug Schepers wrote (on 1/23/08 4:27 PM):
> 
> Hi, Tor, Roc, Oliver, Erik, Mental, and SVG WG-
> 
> I'd like to propose that we have a short meeting dedicated to this. 
> Since this is a time-critical decision for Mozilla, I'd like to see if 
> we can come to a mutual solution for the best way to handle this as 
> promptly as possible.
> 
> We can dedicate the first part of our normal SVG teleconference tomorrow 
> to this topic.  We have a phone bridge and an IRC channel where we 
> scribe and post links.  If you can make it, please RSVP and I'll send 
> you the details.  Here are the normal meeting times (sorry, Mental, I 
> don't know your timezone):
> 
> Thursday, January 24, 2008 at 19:30:00 UTC
> 
> Oslo, Sweden:    Thu 8:30 PM   
> Boston, USA:     Thu 2:30 PM   
> Austin, TX:      Thu 1:30 PM
> San Francisco:   Thu 11:30 AM   
> Wellington, NZ:  Fri 8:30 AM
> Sydney, AU:      Fri 6:30 AM
> 
> 
> Thanks-
> -Doug Schepers
> W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI
> 
> 
> Oliver Hunt wrote (on 1/23/08 2:24 PM):
>>
>> This worries me, we already have filterRes which can be used to tune 
>> down the quality in exchange for performance.  I'm not sure what the 
>> benefit of having a vendor specific css property to (effectively) just 
>> disable filters despite them being otherwise supported by the engine.
>>
>> --Oliver
>>
>> On 23/01/2008, at 11:03 AM, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> As far as I understand this, such a property
>>> '-moz-filter-rendering' can only be used as a
>>> property for example in an external style sheet,
>>> the style element or the style attribute, not as
>>> a presentation attribute?
>>>
>>> Another approach would be to use an own
>>> namespace an the extension mechanism of
>>> SVG to avoid conflicts and problems with
>>> undefined attributes. Such an approach
>>> pronounces, that there is currently no such
>>> attribute in any SVG version, whatever the
>>> future may bring.
>>> There are a few similar things from adobe
>>> arround using such an extension.
>>> If it was no problem that adobe used its
>>> own namespace and extensions, then it
>>> should be no problem for mozilla too ;o)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:56:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:38 GMT