W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > February 2008

Re: [SVG1.1] feSpotLight's limitingConeAngle not mentioned in lighting equations

From: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:30:27 +0100
To: "Tim Rowley" <tor@acm.org>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.t6f6w1uxgqiacl@gnorps.palace.opera.no>

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:30:03 +0200, Tim Rowley <tor@acm.org> wrote:
...
> For example, after the sentance "If L.S is positive, no light is
> present...", something along the lines of the following might be
> added:  "If limitingConeAngle is specified, -L.S <
> cosine(limitingConeAngle) also indicates no light is present."
>
> By the way, in the definition of the limitingConeAngle, the units used
> (degrees or radians) should be indicated.

Thanks for your feedback, the above has been incorporated into the SVG  
Filter 1.2 spec as well as the 1.1 errata, see  
http://www.w3.org/2003/01/REC-SVG11-20030114-errata#limitingconeangle-fespotlight.

Cheers
/Erik, on behalf of the SVG WG (ACTION-1656)

-- 
Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2008 05:32:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:38 GMT