W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: [Bug 5082] Should animate update cursor & status bar?

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:16:21 +0100
Message-ID: <46FB58C5.9010909@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: www-svg@w3.org 

> 
> ------- Comment #3 from schepers@w3.org  2007-09-26 17:01 -------
> it is a link, nor what the link location is.  I could not find any such
> statement in HTML or XLink, either.  I think this should be stated as a SHOULD

Any reference in the HTML specification would be non-normative, as the 
HTML (4 and below, at least) specification is about what HTML means, not 
how user agents should behave.  Even some interactive user agents would 
have difficulty providing cursor feedback.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 07:16:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 27 September 2007 07:16:59 GMT