W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: [Bug 5082] Should animate update cursor & status bar?

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:16:21 +0100
Message-ID: <46FB58C5.9010909@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: www-svg@w3.org

> ------- Comment #3 from schepers@w3.org  2007-09-26 17:01 -------
> it is a link, nor what the link location is.  I could not find any such
> statement in HTML or XLink, either.  I think this should be stated as a SHOULD

Any reference in the HTML specification would be non-normative, as the 
HTML (4 and below, at least) specification is about what HTML means, not 
how user agents should behave.  Even some interactive user agents would 
have difficulty providing cursor feedback.

David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 07:16:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:11 UTC