RE: Broken SVG Tiny 1.1 conformance test: styling-pres-01-t

Hi Chris,

Thanks for the correct link, I was looking at the errata of the 1.1
mobile instead of 1.1 full.

Yours,
  - Kalle 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org] 
> Sent: 25. lokakuuta 2007 14:23
> To: Kalle Raita
> Cc: www-svg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Broken SVG Tiny 1.1 conformance test: styling-pres-01-t
> 
> On Thursday, October 25, 2007, 9:54:29 AM, Kalle wrote:
> 
> KR> Thanks for the quick reply. Yes, the behaviour has been 
> changed in SVGt
> KR> 1.2. We were wondering if it were still possible to amend 
> the SVGt 1.1
> KR> conformance tests regarding this case. An official 
> acknowledgement that
> KR> the case is flawed would help a bit also. We may still 
> have the need to
> KR> produce implementations that are conformant to 1.1 spec 
> instead of 1.2.
> 
> We will certainly discuss doing that, I think it makes sense to do so.
> 
> KR> BTW, I checked the 1.1 errata. It seems to be empty.
> 
> Where are you looking? From http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/  the link to
> errata goes to http://www.w3.org/2003/01/REC-SVG11-20030114-errata
> which is certainly not empty.
> 
> 
> -- 
>  Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
>  Interaction Domain Leader
>  Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
>  W3C Graphics Activity Lead
>  Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
> 
> 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Thursday, 25 October 2007 11:32:55 UTC