Jonathan Chetwynd wrote: > it seems clear to me at least from your responses that specificity is a > clear example where the w3c process has not considered users needs. I'm not quite sure what in my response gave you that idea. I can see where you might have gotten that idea from David's response, but I think his statement was incorrect. If you look at the history of the specificity section, user needs were definitely considered -- this is why user stylesheet !important rules override all author rules. Didn't use to be that way in the early drafts. ;) > from an initial consideration of accessibility, the user being non- > technical needs a simple style sheet that works out of the box across > the web, if it is to be of any use at all. A simple stylesheet that does what? -BorisReceived on Friday, 9 February 2007 09:06:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:36 GMT