W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: opacity, animate and mask

From: ~:'' ありがとうございました。 <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 16:05:05 +0100
Message-Id: <4A2B6662-46C8-480E-9427-D950107232E7@btinternet.com>
Cc: SVG List <www-svg@w3.org>
To: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>

David,

I am requesting Doug provides an example he believes impossible.

It is for us to provide an alternative method.

so your concern around negatives may not in this instance be germane.

regards

Jonathan Chetwynd



On 4 Aug 2007, at 15:07, David Woolley wrote:


~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote:

> are you suggesting that Doug's assertion is without value?

No.  Although formally unprovable, negative assertions can still be  
very useful working hypotheses.
-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 4 August 2007 15:05:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:37 GMT