> I think, what you mean are the commands T and S (or s and t) - > the expansion to Q and C is already mentioned in the specification. > It has to be done by the viewer. > This is straight forward. If you now it for Q -> C the problem is > solved, because the paths are already normalised from small to large > letters, T -> Q -> C and S -> C, therefore it is only the question, > why not L -> C... > Hi Thanks for reply. Now, how to convert T -> Q and S -> C. And what about the relatives path data, can that also be converted from t -> q and s -> c. As I was doing T -> C which was giving wrong results. If T -> Q is done then I think my problem would be solved as I have api's for Q. Thanks Nand Kumar. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SVG-Tiny-1.2-CR2006-08-10%3A-path-data-tf2257979.html#a7235756 Sent from the w3.org - www-svg mailing list archive at Nabble.com.Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 10:09:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 8 November 2006 10:09:18 GMT