- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:44:46 -0500
- To: Andrew Shellshear <Andrew.Shellshear@research.canon.com.au>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Andrew Shellshear wrote: > The complete current text for the SVG document fragment is as follows: > > SVG document fragment > > The XML document sub-tree whose rootmost element is an 'svg' element. > (The rootmost svg element.) > > An SVG document fragment can consist of a stand-alone SVG document, > or a fragment of a parent XML document enclosed by an 'svg' element. > > In SVG Tiny 1.2 each SVG document fragment must not contain nested > 'svg' elements - nested 'svg' elements are unsupported elements. > > Please let us know shortly if this does not address your concerns. This does not address my concerns, for two reasons: 1) From this text, I can't tell what the SVG document fragment is in the original markup I sent in my original comment. 2) The third paragraph here sounds like a restriction on authors. If an author screws up and creates nested 'svg' elements, what will the SVG document fragment be? It still needs to be well-defined for the parts of the spec that reference it to make sense.... -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2006 14:49:13 UTC