On Dec 28, 2005, at 17:35, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > The implementation cost for viewers that should support SVG 1.1 and > SVG > Tiny 1.2 content is increased as they would have to support two > methods > and a new attribute rather than just the two methods, and script > authors > who would like to write their content such that it works in both > SVG 1.1 > and SVG Tiny 1.2 implementations will have to write multiple code > paths > in order to use this facility, so this is not acceptable to me. It has now been set back to the get/set manner it used in 1.1. Thanks for your review, please let us know shortly if this does not satisfy you. -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 10:45:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:34 GMT