Re: SVG12: currentTime vs SVG 1.1

On Dec 28, 2005, at 17:35, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> The implementation cost for viewers that should support SVG 1.1 and  
> SVG
> Tiny 1.2 content is increased as they would have to support two  
> methods
> and a new attribute rather than just the two methods, and script  
> authors
> who would like to write their content such that it works in both  
> SVG 1.1
> and SVG Tiny 1.2 implementations will have to write multiple code  
> paths
> in order to use this facility, so this is not acceptable to me.

It has now been set back to the get/set manner it used in 1.1.

Thanks for your review, please let us know shortly if this does not  
satisfy you.

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/

Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 10:45:47 UTC