W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > May 2006

Re: SVG12: currentTime vs SVG 1.1

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:05:24 +0200
Message-Id: <7AE1E751-3608-4CC9-B879-5568D6D8DA71@expway.fr>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>

On Dec 28, 2005, at 17:35, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> The implementation cost for viewers that should support SVG 1.1 and  
> Tiny 1.2 content is increased as they would have to support two  
> methods
> and a new attribute rather than just the two methods, and script  
> authors
> who would like to write their content such that it works in both  
> SVG 1.1
> and SVG Tiny 1.2 implementations will have to write multiple code  
> paths
> in order to use this facility, so this is not acceptable to me.

It has now been set back to the get/set manner it used in 1.1.

Thanks for your review, please let us know shortly if this does not  
satisfy you.

Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 10:45:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:08 UTC