W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > May 2006

Re: SVG12: Document.documentElement definition

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 16:21:20 +0200
Message-Id: <DD5863C2-EE97-4733-A8FB-64DDD22434E2@expway.fr>
Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>

On Jan 29, 2006, at 20:46, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Robin Berjon wrote:
>> this is an answer to your comment found at:
>>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Jul/0008.html
>>
>> The draft has been modified to fix the grammar and provide a more
>> orthodox definition.
>
> Considering that reviewers still have to point out such problems, I
> don't think this is acceptable, instead of copying and introducing
> incompatibilities, normative reference should be used to define such
> features.

And that is what is currently being used.

Thank you for you very thorough review, please let the WG know  
shortly if you are not satisfied with this response.

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 14:21:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:34 GMT