W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > May 2006

Re: SVG12: Document.documentElement definition

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 16:21:20 +0200
Message-Id: <DD5863C2-EE97-4733-A8FB-64DDD22434E2@expway.fr>
Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>

On Jan 29, 2006, at 20:46, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Robin Berjon wrote:
>> this is an answer to your comment found at:
>>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Jul/0008.html
>> The draft has been modified to fix the grammar and provide a more
>> orthodox definition.
> Considering that reviewers still have to point out such problems, I
> don't think this is acceptable, instead of copying and introducing
> incompatibilities, normative reference should be used to define such
> features.

And that is what is currently being used.

Thank you for you very thorough review, please let the WG know  
shortly if you are not satisfied with this response.

Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 14:21:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:29:31 UTC