On Jan 29, 2006, at 20:46, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Robin Berjon wrote: >> this is an answer to your comment found at: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Jul/0008.html >> >> The draft has been modified to fix the grammar and provide a more >> orthodox definition. > > Considering that reviewers still have to point out such problems, I > don't think this is acceptable, instead of copying and introducing > incompatibilities, normative reference should be used to define such > features. And that is what is currently being used. Thank you for you very thorough review, please let the WG know shortly if you are not satisfied with this response. -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 14:21:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:29:31 UTC