W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2006

RE: SVG12: SVGGlobal::document vs AbstractView

From: Jon Ferraiolo <jonf@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 07:28:10 -0800
Message-ID: <6ECA24BE410D994496A2AE995367C5C88927EA@namail3.corp.adobe.com>
To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>

Hi Boris,
Looking at the latest member-only draft, the SVG Tiny spec normatively
references DOM Level 3 Events but identifies the subset of DOM Level 3
Events that are supported in SVG Tiny. The subset used by the uDOM does
not include the 'view' attribute on the Event interface.

Incidentally, does Mozilla support DOM2 Views? If so, how does an
alternate view manifest itself in Mozilla?


-----Original Message-----
From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbarsky@MIT.EDU] 
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 11:02 PM
To: Jon Ferraiolo
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Subject: Re: SVG12: SVGGlobal::document vs AbstractView

Jon Ferraiolo wrote:
> We don't need AbstractView or DocumentView. The only time one needs
> those two interfaces is when the format supports DOM2 Views, but SVG
> Tiny 1.2 (or any version of SVG) does not support DOM2 Views.

I assume that means that the events in the uDOM are not included by 
reference from DOM 2 Events or anything like that in the latest draft? 
(Not that I'm saying they necessarily should be; just trying to keep up 
with the modifications to the uDOM.)

Received on Friday, 24 March 2006 15:28:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:07 UTC