- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:08:40 +0100
- To: "Ola Andersson" <Ola.Andersson@ikivo.com>
- Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>
* Ola Andersson wrote: >> >parts of the smil animation features are not trivial to capture, >> >therefore the different behavior of implementations. >> >> Thanks for pointing out the adverse relationship between unclear >> specifications and non-interoperable implementations so clearly. >> >> >Although you might find the definition confusing we believe it >> >is correct and will leave it as is. >> >> This is, therefore, not acceptable to me. > >You don't accept that we believe the spec to be correct? Whether or not >you accept our beliefs they still remain the same. We should probably >close this discussion before it becomes even more philosophical. The Working Group and its participants may believe whatever they want, I just object to keep the requirements as difficult to capture as you say they are. I've pointed out in detail why the requirements are not "trivial to capture" and proposed a way to make them considerably more "trivial to capture". The Working Group rejected my proposal claiming that the requirements are both unclear and clear at the same time; all that is left to do for the Working Group is to inform The Director of my objection as required by the W3C Process. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2006 17:08:35 UTC