Re: SVG12: animating transform ref()

* Ola Andersson wrote:
>parts of the smil animation features are not trivial to capture,
>therefore the different behavior of implementations. 

Thanks for pointing out the adverse relationship between unclear
specifications and non-interoperable implementations so clearly.

>Although you might find the definition confusing we believe it
>is correct and will leave it as is.

This is, therefore, not acceptable to me.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/