On Sunday, March 19, 2006, 12:15:08 AM, Bjoern wrote: BH> I therefore think specification of attributeType="XML" should be BH> described as recommended by the specification, and the importance of BH> doing so be highlighted. Please change the draft to this effect. That is a fair point, and a small amount of authoring advice to add attributeType="xml" to avoid inadvertant clashes with future CSS properties seems like a good idea. This might be added in the spec itself, perhaps before CR if we get time, or added in an authoring guidelines document. BH> I note that a better way to address this problem might be to define BH> the value 'auto' in terms of which type is more relevant to the given BH> target, I think that would just generate follow-on comments to define "relevant" and "directly observable behaviour" in great detail. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CGReceived on Monday, 20 March 2006 10:44:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 September 2006 18:11:48 GMT