Hi, Bjoern- Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: | | * Doug Schepers wrote: | >We aren't going to make any conformance requirements on this | point at all. | | So if you defer to SMIL 2.1 your statement that "any changes to SMIL | will only be relevant to later SVG Specifications" is incorrect then | as the SYMM Working Group is free to propose normative corrections | that impose new requirements. While technically you may be correct according to process, it is unlikely that a Rec would have a major change (a new feature, in particular) in the same version. Moreover, my statement was informative, not normative. Regards- Doug doug.schepers@vectoreal.com www.vectoreal.com ...for scalable solutions.Received on Saturday, 4 March 2006 17:20:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:54:58 GMT