- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 18:28:32 +0100
- To: "Doug Schepers" <doug@schepers.cc>
- Cc: "'Jean-Claude Dufourd'" <jcdufourd@gmail.com>, <www-svg@w3.org>
* Doug Schepers wrote: >We agree that this is a serious issue, and since it is outside the scope of >the SVG WG to define this behavior, we will coordinate with the SYMM WG to >address these and related issues. In the meantime, this should not affect >the ability to conformantly implement SVGTiny1.2, since we normatively refer >to SMIL2.1 for this range of behaviors, and any changes to SMIL will only be >relevant to later SVG Specifications. Are you saying the SVG Working Group is going to change the draft such that behavior would be implementation-defined regardless of what future normative corrections to the SMIL 2.1 Recommendation might require? If not, I'm not sure why such a normative correction would not be relevant to SVG Tiny 1.2, and if, I am not sure whether contradicting the SMIL specification would be acceptable in this case. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 3 March 2006 17:27:20 UTC