W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2006

RE: [SVGMobile12] SVGT12-207: <textArea> redundant with HTML

From: Jon Ferraiolo <jonf@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:41:03 -0800
Message-ID: <6ECA24BE410D994496A2AE995367C5C87A137E@namail3.corp.adobe.com>
To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, <www-svg@w3c.org>

Hi Maciej,
OK, forget about the "in scope" response. The other part of the response
was that we have decided to keep <textArea> because the community and
SVG Tiny implementers have requested it.

There is a long, long history of discussion on whether SVG should
support simple text wrapping. Probably 100+ emails on the public list.
We ended up taking a technical approach based on suggestions from the
same Ian Hickson who is now objecting to the feature.

The WG has made its decision.

Jon


-----Original Message-----
From: Maciej Stachowiak [mailto:mjs@apple.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 11:34 AM
To: Jon Ferraiolo
Cc: Ian Hickson; www-svg@w3c.org
Subject: Re: [SVGMobile12] SVGT12-207: <textArea> redundant with HTML


On Mar 1, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Jon Ferraiolo wrote:

>  Also, <textArea> is not a new feature with the 3rd Last Call, so  
> your comment
> is out of the scope of feedback which we have solicited. The 3rd Last
> Call was announced with the following words: "The purpose of this  
> third
> Last Call is to allow reviewers to verify that their comments have  
> been
> included as agreed by the SVG Working Group, it is not intended as a
> new, general review period."

Please address Ian's comment on the substance. The W3C Process says:

"Starting with a Last Call review up to the transition to Proposed  
Recommendation, a Working Group must formally address any substantive  
review comment about a technical report and should do so in a timely  
manner."

http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#doc-reviews

The W3C Process does not appear to allow limiting the scope of a Last  
Call, or indeed to allow limiting the scope of comments addressed  
even up to the PR stage. (It does say a working group "the Working  
Group may decline to make substantive changes to address issues  
raised between the end of a Last Call review period and publication  
of a Recommendation"

In fact the W3C process does not even allow having another Last Call  
immediately after a Last Call draft fails to proceed to CR. The W3C  
Process says:

"The Working Group makes substantive changes to the technical report  
at any time after a Last Call announcement and prior to Publication  
as a Recommendation, except when the changes involve the removal of  
features at risk identified in a Call for Implementations. In the  
case of substantive changes, the Working Group must republish the  
technical report as a Working Draft."

Please follow the W3C Process.

Regards,
Maciej




>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> Jon Ferraiolo
> SVG WG
>
> --------------
>
> From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:25:33 +0000 (UTC)
> To: www-svg@w3.org
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0512281919430.7669@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
>
>
> I object to the inclusion of the <textArea> feature in SVG Tiny  
> 1.2. It
> appears to be no more than a poor man's HTML, dramatically lacking in
> semantics and presentational controls. It is already possible to  
> achieve
>
> any effect that <textArea> introduces, using <foreignObject> and
> embedded
> content styled using CSS' rich formatting properties.
>
> Please remove the <textArea> feature from SVG Tiny 1.2.
>
> -- 
> Ian Hickson               U+1047E                ) 
> \._.,--....,'``.    fL
> http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _ 
> \  ;`._ ,.
> Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'-- 
> (,_..'`-.;.'
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2006 19:42:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:33 GMT