W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > June 2006

RE: Effect of 'animateMotion' on transform.animVal

From: Scott Hayman <shayman@rim.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:22:10 -0400
Message-ID: <1CA55DCF91707745A9B5091A303367E905318459@XCH43YKF.rim.net>
To: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>, <www-svg@w3.org>

Hi Cameron, 

> From: Cameron McCormack

> Scott Hayman:
> > While we don't think that this is an issue, and the fact 
> that 'mask' 
> > is in not in SVG Tiny 1.2, would you mind if we defer this until we 
> > get the spec into CR?
> 
> Sure, I didn't mean this thread to be a last call comment on SVG Tiny
> 1.2 (since I didn't put [SVGMobile12] in the subject line), 
> just a clarification of 1.1.  Sorry if I didn't make this clear.

Thanks.  Just wanted to make sure.

Cheers,
Scott



---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
Received on Wednesday, 21 June 2006 20:23:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:34 GMT