Re: SVG12: animateMotion vs transform=""

Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>   
>> Actually, animateTransform should not have this text. For animateMotion
>> the attributeName is implied and cannot be specified; animateTransform
>> requires specification of the attribute name and any attribute that is
>> a transform-like attribute can be a target, e.g. gradientTransform. The
>> text above reflects that poorly. Simply removing this text for animate-
>> Transform would address this.
>>     
>
> The text is still there, but "SVGT12-276" does not indicate my objection
> to this text.
>   
Whoops!  That's because I thought I had removed it.  It is now removed.  
Please don't be sarcastic at me.

Andrew S.