W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > July 2006

Re: SVG12: animateMotion vs transform=""

From: Andrew Shellshear <andrews@cisra.canon.com.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:29:06 +1000
Message-ID: <44C573E2.1020101@cisra.canon.com.au>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
CC: www-svg@w3.org

Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>   
>> Actually, animateTransform should not have this text. For animateMotion
>> the attributeName is implied and cannot be specified; animateTransform
>> requires specification of the attribute name and any attribute that is
>> a transform-like attribute can be a target, e.g. gradientTransform. The
>> text above reflects that poorly. Simply removing this text for animate-
>> Transform would address this.
>>     
>
> The text is still there, but "SVGT12-276" does not indicate my objection
> to this text.
>   
Whoops!  That's because I thought I had removed it.  It is now removed.  
Please don't be sarcastic at me.

Andrew S.
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2006 01:29:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:35 GMT