- From: Doug Schepers <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:31:28 -0400
- To: "'Bjoern Hoehrmann'" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi, Björn- Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: | | * Doug Schepers wrote: | >...various spellings of "run-time", .... | >Is there a preferred term? I am inclined | >to go with "run time". | | Yes, and use whatever SMIL 2.1 uses most. In the SMIL 2.1 Spec, the big winner was "runtime" runtime: 41 runtimes: 3 run-time: 4 run time: 0! In SVG Tiny 1.2, it is also the winner, but only because I changed all the other instances: runtime: 2 runtimes: 0 run-time: 6 run time: 1 I have standardized on "runtime" throughout. | It is indeed unfortunate that the SMIL specification does not make | consistent use of terms, but event value syntax is introduced by | | An Event value starts with an Eventbase-element term that specifies | the /event-base element/. | | which is clearly meant to introduce correct terminology and shows | that "Eventbase-element" is just a random symbol in a grammar, not | a formally defined term. I buy that. I've changed "Eventbase-element" to "event-base element" throughout (gladly, because the former was a clunky term). Thanks for your feedback. Let us know right away if this doesn't satisfy your concern. Thanks- Doug, on behalf of the SVG WG
Received on Monday, 24 July 2006 19:31:42 UTC