RE: SVG12: namespace'd events vs animation

* Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: 
> SVG Tiny 1.2 must allow use of event types in a namespace whereever it
> allows use of event types not within a namespace to ensure that anyone
> coming up with new event types can make an informed decision which ex-
> tension scheme to use; there is no technical reason to make event types
> in a namespace second class event types. So, no, your response, which
> does not really discuss my concern, does not address my concern.

This addition would change functionality which has been in the spec since version 1.0, namely that there is no way to express what namespace event-ref has.


All the best,
Andrew Emmons, on behalf of the SVG Working Group

> --
> Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
> Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
> 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

Received on Thursday, 20 July 2006 12:21:52 UTC